[ad_1]
The Board of Management for Cricket in India (BCCI) introduced a ‘Check Cricket Incentive Scheme’ on Saturday to assist the monetary development of cricketers who prioritise Check cricket.
The scheme added an extra reward construction on prime of the present match charge for Check matches. India’s head coach Rahul Dravid, nevertheless, careworn on the truth that it was extra of a reward from the Board and never an incentive.
“It’s good that the BCCI is recognising it…” Dravid stated on Saturday.
“I believe it’s a reward, not an incentive. Trying on the guys who got here in and performed on this collection, I believe everybody needs to play Check cricket. It’s only a recognition of what you want to have the ability to do to outlive and play in Check cricket. It’s solely once you get right here that you just realise that typically it’s fairly robust…”
ALSO READ | I know what what it’s like to lose to Indian ‘B’ Team: Paine
India thumped England 4-1 in a five-match collection and with a bunch of children like Sarfaraz Khan, Devdutt Padikkal and Dhruv Jurel rising to the event, it was actually a dream outing for India.
“I actually hope cash is just not going to be the motivation to play Check cricket. It’s simply good the arduous work and the way robust Check cricket might be is being recognised. So, I wouldn’t see it as an incentive to make folks play Check cricket, I hope not,” Dravid, earlier than including with a smile, “I hope it by no means actually involves that…”
Lauding the efforts of Ravichandran Ashwin, who featured in his one hundredth Check and claimed 9 wickets within the sport, Dravid stated, “It takes a particular individual to do what Ashwin has completed, to play 100 Check matches. You undergo loads, and rightly so. You guys celebrated Ashwin at the moment, and Jonny Bairstow, you’ve celebrated [Ben] Stokes just a few video games in the past. All of you recognise how difficult the format is and what it takes to have the ability to have consistency and to have the ability to survive the take a look at of time on this format…We don’t have a good time 100 T20s in the identical method, will we?…”
[ad_2]
